Hubungan antara Work Life Balance dan Kepuasan Kerja pada Karyawan di PT PLN PERSERO Area Ambon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31959/jm.v7i1.86Keywords:
Work Life Balance, Kepuasan KerjaAbstract
Every organization expects every employee to have a high level of job satisfaction. This study aimed to see the relationship between work life balance and job satisfaction by using quantitative methods with product moment correlation technique from Carl Pearson. Hypothesis in this research was a positive and significant correlation between work life balance and job satisfaction. Measuring tool used in this research was work life balance scale by Hayman (2005) with result of reliability test was 0.774 and job satisfaction scale by Spector (1997) with result of reliability test was 0.942. The sample of this research was employees at PT PLN Ambon Area. From product moment correlation analysis obtained r value = 0.337 with significance 0.001 (p <0.05). The result of statistical analysis obtained showed that there was a positive and significant relationship between work life balance and job satisfaction at employees in PT PLN Persero Ambon Area.
References
As’ad, M.(2004). Psikologi Industri: Seri Ilmu Sumber Daya Manusia. Yokyakarta: penerbit Liberty.
Endrastyana, dkk.(2015). Hubungan antara Gaya Kepemimpinan Transformasional dan Work Life Balance dengan Kepuasan Kerja pada Guru Sekokah Dasar di Yayasan Perhimpunan Pendidikan Kristen Surakarta. Jurnal Wacana Psikologi, 2(1), 1-12.
Efendi, Z. (2014). Hubungan Antara Work-Life Balance Initiatives Dan Employee Engagement Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Pada Tenaga Profesional Lembaga Pendidikan X. Tesis. Yogyakarta: S2 Magister Profesi Universitas Gajah Mada
Fisher-McAuley, G., Stanton, J., Jolton, J., & Gavin, J. (2003). Modeling the relationship between work-life balance and organizational outcomes. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial-Organisational Psychology. 1-26.
Hayman, J. (2005). Psychometric Assessment of an Instrument Designed to Measure Work Life Balance, Research and Practice in Human Resource Management, 13.1. 85-91.
Hochschild, A.R. (1997). When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work. California Management Review, 39 (4), 79-97.
JobStreet. (2014). 73% Karyawan Tidak Puas dengan Pekerjaan Mereka. Diunduh dari Http://www.jobstreet.co.id/career-resources/73-karyawan-tidak-puas-dengan-pekerjaan-mereka/#.WtgZ69CyTqB. Diakses pada 18 Januari 2018.
Lockwood, N.R. (2003). Work/Life Balances : Challenges And Solutions. Society For Human Resource Management, SHRM Research Journal.
Moedy, D.M.R. (2013). Analisis Work-Life Balance, Keinginan Untuk Meninggalkan Organisasi, Kepenatan (Burnout) Dan Kepuasan Kerja Pada Dosen Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta. E-Journal Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.
Nitisemito, A.S. (2002).Manajemen Personalia Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Pfeffer, J. (1994). Competitive Advantage through People: Unleashing the Power of the Work Force. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Ramadhani, M.. (2013). Analisis Pengaruh Keseimbangan Kehidupan-Kerja Terhadap Kesuksesan Karir (Studi pada Karyawan PT. Asuransi Jiwa Generali Indonesia). Jurnal FEB Universitas Brawijaya Malang.
Snell, S. A., Youndt, M. A., & Wright, P. M. (1996). Establishing a framework for research in strategic human resource management: Merging resource theory and organizational learning. In G. Ferris, (ed.). Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management. 14. 61-90.
Spector, P.E. (1997). Job Satisfaction: Application, Assesment, Causes, and Consuquences. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Sugiyono. (2005). Statistika untuk penelitian. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta
. (2011). Metode penelitian administrasi. Bandung: Alfabeta
. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Sumantri, S. (2001). Perilaku Organisasi. Bandung: Universitas Padjadjaran